Assassination on the Innocent: The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre of 1572

Oil painting by Francois Dubois which now resides in The Cantonal Museum of Fine Arts in Lausanne, Switzerland | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In the early hours of August 24, 1572, all was calm in France until an unexpected chaos struck the Protestant Huguenots gathered at the Louvre Palace in Paris. After attending the wedding festivities between the Protestant Prince Henry of Navarre and the Catholic Margaret of Valois, the Huguenots were resting when a Catholic mob begin to attack those around the palace. The Catholics had planned an attack on the Huguenots, slaughtering as many as they could. Thousands of bodies covered the streets of Paris, and it became painted in red by the execution of the Huguenots. And the slaughter soon spread to nearby towns and cities. This attack on French Protestants by their Catholic countrymen was one of the worst in the age of European religious civil wars. How exactly did this come about?

During the mid-sixteenth century, the Reformation movement had spread from its origins in Lutheran Germany, finally reaching France; and it brought with it violent clashes between France’s Catholic population and its converts to Protestantism known as Huguenots. By 1570, there were Huguenots communities throughout France, and they were subject to numerous rounds of attacks by their Catholic countrymen in a series of religious civil wars, the last of which came to a temporary end with the Peace of Saint Germain in August of 1570. While neither religion had gained the upper hand over the other, both wanted to end the violence. Yet a conflict over whose religion would dominate France persisted between the two religions. The Huguenots, following the teachings of John Calvin, believed that they were the ‘elect’ and were predestined to be saved. The Catholics, who followed Catholicism, were led by the Guise family, who believed that the Huguenots were heretics that should be exterminated.1 The Guise family was a powerful and loyal support for the Catholic church in France. The main purpose of the Guise family was to conserve the Catholic faith and be the dominant religion in France. The Peace of Saint Germain was opposed by the Guise family, who had had nothing to do with the treaty, but who wouldn’t have hesitated to support it, if they had known that it was a trap to get rid of the Huguenots in Paris.2

The St Germain treaty granted the Huguenots control of a number of fortified towns and the right to hold public office, but not including public office in Paris or in the Royal Court. It also led to Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, leader of the Huguenot movement, to be appointed as a member of the King’s council.3 In order to bring about a peace between the two religions, as part of the settlement in the Peace of Saint Germain, Queen Catherine de Medici arranged the marriage between her daughter, Margaret of Valois and the Protestant Henry of Navarre on August 18, 1572. Religious tensions yet remained high, violence continued to flare up between the Catholics and the Protestants, and religious rioting continued to be widespread. Despite the tensions, the union of Margaret and Henry was intended as a reconciliation between the Catholics and Huguenots.4

“Un Matin devant la Porte du Louvre,” Queen Catherine observing the remainder of the massacre | 1880 | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The plotted assassination of the French Protestants could have been the arrangement of Catherine de Medici. The Queen, continuing to want power over France, decided she would keep a close eye on the Huguenot leader Coligny and his followers, to make sure things were going the way she desired. This is the reason why she arranged the marriage between her daughter to Protestant Henry, who was in line to become a future king of France. But it all backfired with the appointment of Admiral Coligny to her son’s, King Charles IX, council. Coligny’s appointment led to a flourishing relationship between the two men, which was something that the Queen had not planned on.

During his time on the council, the Protestant Dutch were currently under control of Catholic King Philip II of Spain. The admiral wanted to intervene and help the Dutch forces become free of the Spanish, and he received the support of King Charles to aid William of Orange, the leader of the Dutch revolt, to attack Spanish forces in the Netherlands. The Queen did not want to go to war with Catholic Spain, toward which the admiral seemed to be leading them.5 Starting to consider Coligny dangerous, the Queen become jealous of Charles and the admiral’s relationship, so she had to get rid of Coligny. Therefore, she conspired against the admiral. How exactly did she do it? With the help of the Guise family. She persuaded Charles that the admiral was planning to have Protestantism become the dominate religion in France, overthrowing the Catholics. The King, fearing that the Spanish forces now had a motive to invade France and that the Huguenots would take control of the Catholic church, agreed to the assassination of the admiral.6 The young king Charles was a weak leader, easily manipulated and influenced to do what others wanted of him; Charles was the prey of many, including his own mother.

Death of Admiral Coligny, who was stabbed and thrown out a window to be the trash of others. The slaying of the Huguenots is also shown | Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

On August 18, 1572, the day of the wedding between Margaret and Henry, the ceremony was performed in the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.7 The wedding brought days of festivities; among those attending were noble Huguenots who were in Paris to celebrate with their leader, Henry of Navarre. Queen Catherine, Charles, and the Guise family, however, were planning a different type of celebration. They were planning to get rid of the admiral. The plan was set in motion, and four days after the wedding, on August 22, a man hired by the Guise family was to do the bloody work for them; Maurevert was recruited to assassinate Admiral Coligny.8 Maurevert shot from a window, hitting the admiral with two bullets. One bullet hit a finger on his right hand and the other hit his left arm, leaving him very much alive. The failed murder of Coligny caused great fear in the Guise family, as well as to Catherine and to Charles, who feared that the admiral was aware that they had been the ones behind the shooting. In their moment of fear, Charles commanded a mass slaughter of Coligny and his followers, so that none of them could retaliate against him and his family. Because they knew many Huguenots were in Paris celebrating the wedding festivities, it would be a large number of Huguenots that would be slaughtered. No Huguenot would expect it; therefore, none would be able to fight back. The king gave the order: “Qu’on les rue tous,” meaning that all must be slain.9

Nevertheless, the admiral was unaware of who was behind his attempted assassination. While the admiral was taken to his home to be aided and to recover, he wept: “I think myself blessed to have received these wounds in God’s cause …. I forgive freely and with all my heart, both him that struck me and those who incited him to do it; for I am sure it is not in their power to do me any evil, not even if they kill me.”10

On August 24, two days after the attempted assassination of the admiral, an order was given by King Charles to finally perform the deed and execute Coligny. Finally succeeding, Coligny was stabbed in the chest, his head decapitated and his body severely mutilated, and then his corpse was thrown out the window of his home. The remains of his body were burned and thrown into the river and removed again. Claude Haton, a Catholic priest, described the happening “as unworthy to be food for fish.”11 His head was also said to have been used by Parisian children as a ball for entertainment. What came after Coligny’s killing was massive bloodshed. The Huguenots that had gathered around the Louvre Palace were attacked by hired thugs and criminals to slaughter as many Huguenots as they could find. Soon Parisian Catholics begin to join in on the act. Among the victims of the Saint Bartholomew’s massacre were men, women, and children whose bodies were mutilated and left to rot; and some were thrown into the Seine river. Arms, legs, and heads of the innocent all littered the streets of Paris. One known victim was Peter Ramus, an important French philosopher who reorganized Aristotle’s thinking.12 The event in Paris inspired Catholic citizens to join in on the act, and the murder spread to nearby cities: Lyon, Rouen, Bordeaux, and Toulouse all experienced the violence of the Catholic mob.13

Medal Commemorated by Pope Gregory XIII to celebrate the slaughter of the Huguenots | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Across Europe, the Protestant community was utterly shocked at the horror of the massacres, while the Catholic community celebrated the murder of the Huguenots. Pope Gregory XIII ordered the bells in Rome to ring in celebration of the St. Bartholomew’s massacre, even issuing a medal celebrating the slaughter of the Huguenots.14 The horror of lives lost at Paris and in its neighboring regions were never confirmed, but it is estimated that about 10,000 innocent individuals lost their lives to the violence of the Catholic mob. Although many historians still question why the massacres transpired and who the leading mastermind behind the assassinations were, one thing that all can agree on is that the Saint Bartholomew’s Massacre was one of the worst atrocities brought about by the hatred and revenge of individuals because of religion tensions. If either the Queen, the Peace of Saint-Germain, or Admiral Coligny’s chapter in the King’s life triggered the massacre, it will continue to be a question that will have differing answers. After the assassination of the Huguenots in France, the fourth war on religion soon begin and the division between the Catholics and Protestants continued. France during the sixteenth century was painted in red, and the event known as “The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre” will remain a bold punctuation mark in the heart of that century.

  1. Edward Wheland, “What was the Impact of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) on France?,”, (May 2017).
  2. Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868), 317.
  3. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “French wars of Religion, 1562-1598.”
  4. Frank Ardolino, “In Paris? Mass, and Well Remembered,” The Sixteenth Century Journal 21, no. 3 (1990): 401.
  5.  New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day, Massacre of,” by W.J. Stankiewiez.
  6.  Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by James F. Hitchcock.
  7. Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868), 372.
  8. James R. Smither, “The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre and Images of Kingship France: 1572-1574, “The Sixteenth Century Journal 22, no. 1 (1991): 29.
  9.  New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day, Massacre of,” by W.J. Stankiewiez.
  10.  Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868, 380-381.
  11. Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868, 411.
  12. Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by James F. Hitchcock.
  13. Europe, 1450 to 1789: Encyclopedia of the Early Modern World, 2004, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by Barbara Diefendorf.
  14. Edward Wheland, “What was the Impact of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) on France?,”, (May 2017).
Written By
More from Maria Esquivel


  • Interesting article. Religion is a very strong concept, it is incredible how far a misunderstanding can go. The Saint Bartholomew’s Massacre took me by surprise, I didn’t expect citizens to join in the mutilation of men, women, and children. Ten thousand innocents died because of this. You don’t get to read “celebrated the massacre” very often

  • Religion has always been a big conflict between communities. I have never heard of this massacre, and the fact that the pope celebrated it. That makes him look very bad. This event was an eye opener. This article did a swell job on informing us (the readers) on what exactly happened that day and how it all began. The catholic church was separating around this time because of fighting that was going on based on religion.

  • The separation between peoples based on religion has always been a problem, but this article highlights it in such an intense way it makes it hard not to question whether or not religion is actually as useful as people say. Even though the Protestants and Catholics celebrated and worshipped the same God, that still wasn’t enough and led to the horrible split Massacre. A religion that is supposed to practice loving one another and accepting on of God’s children did nothing but demonstrate the harsh diversity. Being a Christian is supposed to mean loving all of God’s people, not killing them off just for your own gain.

  • As someone who was taught Catholic History many times in high school, I have never heard of such a massacre caused by the Catholics. It pains me to hear about Christians killing each other for what seems to be a small difference in beliefs. It also disgusted that the Pope would ring the bells in celebration of the massacre. Great article, very well written.

  • Nice article. It is interesting to read about this event in more detail. I am currently reading the second volume of the history of the English speaking peoples, and Churchill briefly discusses this event. It is remarkable that this time period was filled so much religious tension. Especially when you consider how most christian denominations today live in peace with each other. I cannot believe that Gregory XIII issued a medal to celebrate the event. As if the slaughter of 10,000 innocent people was some sort of victory for the Catholic faith.
    P.S did you know that Mary of Guise was the mother of Mary Queen of Scots

  • In the 21st Century there are many news stories about violence on every NEWS station, social media outlets, and amongst peers and individuals. But then there are stories of those who rely on religion to guide and reassure themselves; I, myself, do the same. I have read about violence amongst religions and am dumbfounded to hear and see such violence amongst religions who preach about peace. As for “The St. Bartholomew’s Day of Massacre of 1572” I am taken aback to read such violence and manipulation between each other. It is insane to read that such violence was condoned and celebrated from Catholics and the Pope. Overall, this article was very interesting to read and opened my eyes to the violence amongst the Catholics and Protestants from the past.

  • I loved how the article started off with the outcome of the day first then worked its way backwards and showed the causes and the effects. “How exactly did this come about?” was a very good use of a hook and definitely made me want to keep reading. Very compelling how the writer chose to socially analyze the Treaty and how it worked into the unfolding of the plot (especially how exactly the arranged marriage worked into the grand scheme of things). It is very chilling how the death toll of the Huguenots was never confirmed and I had to appreciate how the author admitted that historians to this day can still not agree on how exactly the massacre came to unfold.

  • The Saint Bartholomew’s Day Massacre has never been taught to me or even mention, but the amount of blood shed told throughout this article is sickening, that I honestly felt I was reading an event from a horror or action/adventure novel. It’s chilling to believe that religion is this strong of a motivator, that it prompts a massacre of this proportion in what is supposed to be a civilized region. To kill men, women, and children, simple to keep the Protestant religion from holding a solid place in government completely baffles me and is quite frightening to think about.

  • I found this article interesting because of how it details the St. Bartholomew’s Massacre of 1572. Around the time of the massacre, Catholic church was beginning to split due to infighting and strict laws the church had. Most people were tired of how the Catholic practiced their faith, so people began to break from the church and formed other Christian faiths. I never knew both Catholics and Protestants would actually resort to violence, in order to prove who was right in their faith. Overall, this article was good, informative, and well-written.

  • I was at a loss to the Pope ringing the bells in Rome for celebration of the massacre. I have never heard of these events and how they affect two different communities. This was an eye opener to how religion can affect communities in either a positive or negative way. One side such as the Huguenots received the negative spectrum of other religious views imposed on theirs. This massacre will be one I will remember and learn more about.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.