Konerak Sinthasomphone: Dahmer’s Victim Who Didn’t Have To Die

Konerak Sinthasomphone, 14 | Courtesy of WordPress

Konerak Sinthasomphone—a name that probably rings no bells of familiarity in your head, certainly not as much as the name of his murderer: Jeffrey Dahmer. Dahmer’s infamous killing spree ended in 1991 when Tracy Edwards broke out of the murderer’s clutches and ran out into the night. With a pair of handcuffs dangling from one of his wrists, he flagged down a police squad car on its routine patrol. Edwards staggered up to the car, desperately pleading for help. The smell of alcohol lingered on his breath and words tumbled out of his mouth as he explained his situation to Officers Robert Rauth and Rolf Mueller: someone was trying to kill him. His eyes shifted nervously from side to side, as if he expected his assailant to pounce at any second. Despite being slightly skeptical of Edwards’ story, Rauth and Mueller followed his directions to Oxford Apartments #213, where they were greeted by a polite and soft-spoken Jeffrey Dahmer. Dahmer calmly denied any wrong doing, but an odor more pungent than the beer on his breath infiltrated his apartment, suggesting otherwise. A brief search of the apartment revealed a butcher knife Edwards had described, and evidence far more sinister: photographs depicting mutilated and disfigured male bodies, drums containing human torsos submerged in a chemical solution, and human meat wrapped neatly in bags within the freezer.1 Dahmer was arrested and, while in custody, ultimately admitted to murdering and sometimes even cannibalizing seventeen boys and men. Among his victims was one Konerak Sinthasomphone. Like Edwards, Sinthasomphone also had a chance for escape. However, unlike Edwards, Sinthasomphone wasn’t as lucky.

Konerak Sinthasomphone was a Laotian immigrant whose family left the Nonkai refugee resettlement camp in Thailand to seek out a life in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1979. At the age of three, Sinthasomphone began his new life in the United States.2 Twelve years later, on May 6, 1991, Jeffrey Dahmer approached fourteen year old Konerak Sinthasomphone at the Grand Avenue Mall and offered him money in exchange for his visit to an apartment to pose for nude pictures, which the child reluctantly agreed to. Coincidentally and unbeknownst to Sinthasomphone, Dahmer was a probationer convicted of second-degree sexual assault for drugging and molesting a thirteen year old boy in 1988. His victim? Sinthasomphone’s older brother, Keison Sinthasomphone. According to his family, Konerak wouldn’t have been able to recognize Dahmer as the man who wreaked havoc on his family only three years before, as the family never directly saw his face. Indeed, they were assured by police that Dahmer’s punishment would be severe, and didn’t find it necessary to visit the court the day Dahmer was tried and sentenced to one year of work release and five years of probation. “We never saw him. Police officers told us they were going to put him away for good. We never thought he was going to be out,” said Anoukone Sinthasomphone, Konerak’s oldest brother.3 Dahmer and Sinthasomphone proceeded together to his apartment. Konerak posed for Polaroid pictures in his underwear, the young boy oblivious to the horrific hidden agenda of the man behind the camera. After a while, Dahmer offered Sinthasomphone a drink laced with Halcion, a medication used to treat insomnia.4 Konerak quickly lost consciousness, rendering him vulnerable at the hands of the “Milwaukee Monster.”

Like a fly caught in a spider’s web, once Konerak was unconscious, Dahmer put his twisted plan into action. According to his disposition testimony, he drilled a small hole in the back of Sinthasomphone’s cranium and injected hydrochloric acid into the frontal lobes of his brain. Hydrochloric acid is an extremely corrosive acid that can have irreversible and even fatal effects if used improperly. Dahmer did this to induce a “zombie-like” state in his victims. He experimented with hydrochloric acid in hopes of creating a submissive, mindless sex slave. When confronted about his crimes, Dahmer claimed “the only motive that there ever was was to completely control a person … and keep them with me as long as possible.”5 Like most serial killers, Dahmer’s childhood wasn’t the happiest. He grew up in a deteriorating and dysfunctional home, and his father was often absent from home addressing work-related matters while his mother often spent time in the hospital for psychiatric reasons during his early childhood.6 As a young boy, Dahmer held a unique fascination for dead insects and animals. He kept a collection of their remains or, as he called them, “fiddlesticks” in a shed behind the family home. On one occasion, upon discovering a decomposing dead dog along the road, he disemboweled and decapitated the animal before impaling its head on a stick.7 When Dahmer was fifteen, he stole a mannequin on display at a local retail store. He rested with the dummy in his bed when his parents weren’t home, fueling his necrophilic desires. Dahmer’s senior year in high school only brought increased tension to his character, as his parents tragically divided the family home, no longer able to maintain a functional and healthy marriage. Following a bitter divorce with a custody battle revolving around Dahmer’s twelve year old brother, Dahmer developed a reliance on alcohol and, with a decline in emotional resources, he fell into withdrawal and depression. “It was this time when I began having fantasies of killing people; these fantasies overcame my feelings of frustration and emptiness.”8 Dahmer grew from an adolescent boy to an adult, but his sadistic and necrophilic fantasies followed. After his arrest, he reported about his first murder victim, Steven Hicks, “the guy wanted to leave and I didn’t want him to leave.” In another interview, he explained that “it was better to have them with me dead, than to have them leave.”9 A childhood of social isolation and neglect had left Dahmer a psychotic killer who craved nothing more than a submissive, mindless sex slave incapable of the abandonment and neglect he faced as a child, and he was determined to mold Sinthasomphone into this by any means necessary.

Jeffrey Dahmer: The Milwaukee Murderer | Courtesy of biography.com

However, no less than a day later, Dahmer’s plan went completely awry. On the morning of May 27, 1991, Dahmer left a drugged and unconscious Konerak Sinthasomphone in his apartment while he went to a local store to buy beer. Miraculously, the young boy escaped Dahmer’s apartment and made his way into the streets of Milwaukee, where he was seen by Sandra Smith and Nicole Childress. Smith saw, as she described, a Chinese boy running naked towards an alley next to her mother’s apartment on North 25th Street. The boy, who she suspected to be eleven or twelve, collapsed on the ground. Upon closer inspection, she noted that Sinthasomphone had scrapes on his knees, buttocks, and right shoulder. She also noticed that there was a thin stream of blood running down his inner thigh from his rectum. Smith turned to Childress and urgently told her to call the police. It was then that Dahmer appeared, calmly attempting to dissolve the situation, claiming Sinthasomphone was a friend of his who merely had a habit of drinking too much on the weekends. Smith, suspicious of Dahmer and his motives, stood between him and the boy, but eventually allowed Dahmer to lead Sinthasomphone away, noting that the boy appeared to be trying to break away. The police arrived then; Officers Gabrish and Balcerzak were sent to assess the scene. Gabrish was ordered to question Sinthasomphone while Balcerzak was sent to get a statement from Dahmer. Sinthasomphone, presumably because of the drugs he was given or the hole drilled into his head, was unresponsive and deemed uncooperative. After failing to communicate with him, Gabrish merely assumed the young boy couldn’t speak English. Dahmer, on the other hand, was trying desperately to avoid detection and did his best to appear cooperative and polite. He gave Balcerzak his name, date of birth, and employment identification. He claimed Sinthasomphone was his house guest named John Mung who drank too much. He also told officers Sinthasomphone was between 18 or 20 years old, which, standing 5’3 and weighing 110 pounds, seemed almost too ridiculous to believe—but they did. Just as Dahmer was beginning to feel like the situation was back under his control, a second squad car arrived on the scene. Officers Porubcan and Mozejewski got out of the vehicle and informed an uneasy Dahmer that they were simply providing “informal backup.”10 Gibrish and Porubcan, despite Sinthasomphone’s constant stumbling and resistance, calmly escorted him back to Dahmer’s apartment. The apartment portrayed no signs of conflict or a struggle, but there were a variety of nude photographs of Sinthasomphone strewn around the room, suggesting a consensual romantic relationship. The officers, convinced this was nothing more than a lovers’ quarrel, left Dahmer and Sinthasomphone to their own devices. The door closed behind them, and helpless Sinthasomphone was once again left alone in the hands of a sadistic killer, only this time there was no chance of escape.11

Reactions to Sinthasomphone’s death | Courtesy of ThaiVisa

Konerak Sinthasomphone was killed by Jeffrey Dahmer some thirty minutes after he was returned back into his possession. Dahmer injected another dosage of hydrochloric acid into his cranium; this time, it was lethal enough to kill the young boy. Sandra Smith, the woman who discovered Sinthasomphone in the streets, revealed that she had tried explaining to the officers that Dahmer had referred to Sinthasomphone by different names and that he appeared to be trying to break free from Dahmer. The officers insisted that Dahmer was trying to help him walk, and threatened her with arrest. As a result, Smith fled the scene. Backlash against the officers and the Milwaukee Police Department would follow Dahmer’s arrest just a few months later, when the truth finally came out about the young Laotian boy. Many were rightfully infuriated at the officer’s negligence. A quick background check on Dahmer would have revealed that he was a registered sex offender on probation for molesting Sinthasomphone’s older brother. On top of it all, Balcerzak and Gabrish sent away the ambulance scheduled to arrive on the scene minutes before it did, insisting that it wasn’t needed despite failing to thoroughly check Sinthasomphone for any injuries. And, lastly, they ignored and dismissed the women who, until their arrival, worked to protect the victim from further harm. In the early 1990s, racial tensions still had their grip on society. Many believe the officer’s negligence was the result of underlying racism and homophobia. Dahmer’s neighbors have maintained that Sandra Smith and Nicole Childress were dismissed by the officers because of their African descent. They believe that the Laotian boy was returned to Dahmer because Dahmer, like the officers, was white. Belcerzak and Gabrish not only failed to aid an injured and naked young boy, but dismissed every suspicious and alarming detail about the situation as nothing more than “a squabble between homosexuals.” An audio log released shortly after the event revealed the officers making homophobic remarks after leaving the scene. “The intoxicated Asian naked male (laughter in background) was returned to his sober boyfriend (more laughter).”12 When ordered to investigate another scene, one officer joked about washing off after visiting the homosexuals, stating that “my partner is going to get deloused at the station.13 Their actions faced a great amount of public scrutiny, and they were terminated shortly after the Sinthasomphone situation. However, despite all this, the officers were never brought up on legal charges. Gabrish later addressed the incident claiming, “God as my witness, I just didn’t dump a little boy in the hands of a murderer. That’s not what happened. We’re trained to be observant and spot things,” he said. “There was just nothing that stood out, or we would have seen it. I’ve been doing this for a while, and usually if something stands out, you’ll spot it. There just wasn’t anything there.”14 Both officers later appealed their termination and were reinstated in 1994, going on to lead successful careers within the police force despite being tied to the grisly murder of a young boy just three years prior.

Konerak’s Grave | Courtesy of FindAGrave.com

In Konerak Sinthasomphone’s case, Gabrish and Belcerzak’s negligence was just as deadly as a murder weapon. However, let’s not forget the real monster that lurked the streets of Milwaukee in 1991: Jeffrey Dahmer. A necrophilic, sadistic, and cannibalistic pedophile that brought the world so much pain with every life that he took. Konerak Sinthasomphone was just one example of the seventeen cases of innocent men brutally murdered at the selfish hands of the infamous Milwaukee Monster.

  1. Richard W. Jaeger and Marv Balousek, Massacre in Milwaukee: The Macabre Case of Jeffrey Dahmer (Oregon: Waubesa Press, 1991), 9-12.
  2. Rogers Washington, “Boy’s Death Leave Kin Sad, Angry,” Chicago Tribune, August 1991, 5.
  3. Rogers Washington, “Boy’s Death Leave Kin Sad, Angry,” Chicago Tribune, August 1991, 5.
  4. “Estate of Sinthasomphone v. City of Milwaukee, 838 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D. Wis. 1993),” November 1993, Justia US Law, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/838/1320/2255276/.
  5. Marianne Eloise, “Why Do So Many People Sympathise with Serial Killer Jeffrey Dahmer?,” Vice Magazine, February 2017, 4.
  6. Catherine E. Purcell and Bruce A. Arrigo, The Psychology of Lust Murder: Paraphilia, Sexual Killing, and Serial Homicide (Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2006), 74.
  7. Catherine E. Purcell and Bruce A. Arrigo, The Psychology of Lust Murder: Paraphilia, Sexual Killing, and Serial Homicide (Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2006), 73.
  8. Catherine E. Purcell and Bruce A. Arrigo, The Psychology of Lust Murder: Paraphilia, Sexual Killing, and Serial Homicide (Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2006), 75-76.
  9. Catherine E. Purcell and Bruce A. Arrigo, The Psychology of Lust Murder: Paraphilia, Sexual Killing, and Serial Homicide (Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2006), 80.
  10. “Estate of Sinthasomphone v. City of Milwaukee, 838 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D. Wis. 1993),” November 1993, Justia US Law, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/838/1320/2255276/.
  11. “Estate of Sinthasomphone v. City of Milwaukee, 838 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D. Wis. 1993),” November 1993, Justia US Law, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/838/1320/2255276/.
  12. Tobin Beck, “Tape: Police thought boy was Dahmer’s adult lover,” United Press International, August 1991.
  13. Tobin Beck, “Tape: Police thought boy was Dahmer’s adult lover,” United Press International, August 1991.
  14. “Officer Defends Giving Boy Back To Dahmer,” Associated Press, August 1991.
Written By
More from Averie Mendez

28 Comments

  • I really enjoyed this article. It was well structured and explained all/most aspect of the story. I particularly like the flashback used in the introduction. I had already learned of Jeffery Dalmer and his notorious deeds but I had never heard of this particular story. The first learned of this individual in a comic book named “my friend Dalmer” which was written and illustrated by a person who knew Dalmer in highschool. The book is well written and explores many aspect of the Dalmer’s life and secrete life. I recommend it.

  • I love the different approach taken in telling this story. From the very beginning it captivated me and I wanted to know more about who Konerak Sinthasomphone was. It was crazy to read that Dahmer had already built a connection with his victim through his brother. Although I found it strange of the family to not show up to Dahmer’s sentencing after he had molested their son. It was very disappointing to read the Konerak had escaped but the police gave in to Dahmer’s politeness and left him to die at the hands of this man. The lack of effort and proper reasoning by the police officers is really astonishing and I can’t help but wonder how many times this has happened in other stories of potential abuse or assault. Overall, this was an interesting and well written article.

  • I had never heard of Jeffery Dahmer but after reading this article I think that I will do some more research on him. This was a very interesting article to read and the author did a really good job of presenting the situation that they were trying to explain. The author also used a lot of details which made it easier for me to picture what was going on which is always good when telling a story.

  • At first, when I started reading this, I thought it was about more of Tracy Edwards, but it took a turn that made the story even more intriguing. Once reading this, something about the name Dahmer rang some bells but not too many. I can only imagine how terrifying the family must have felt hearing that the same person who sexually assaulted one of their children faced a bare minimum sentence and had the chance to strike again, only this time, on their other son. Sadly enough, rather than just being sexually assaulted, he was murdered. It makes me question sometimes just how much our justice system lets slide. Great article!

  • This was such an interesting article! I enjoyed every minute while I was reading it. I knew of Jeffrey Dahmer, but I did not know of any of his victims. The story of this particular victim was crazy. I cannot believe that the officers failed to examine Konerak Sinthasomphone’s injuries, threatened to arrest the woman who was only trying to protect the young boy, did not do a simple background check on Jeffrey Dahmer, and even made discriminating remarks about the situation and people while they were leaving the scene.

  • I had read about Jeffrey Dahmer before and watched a couple of documentaries about him. The story of this young boy however is overlooked. He had the chance to escape and live a life that Dahmer so viciously took away from him. How does one act so normal that no one even imagines him to be evil. My true worry is the officer who looked past this young boy who was in so much pain and distraught. Why did he not look further into it? I believe a lot in faith and him being able to run away even after a hole was put into his head, was a sign that God was with him and fighting through it. How the officer did not notice that it was a crime scene baffles me as drugs may have been an excuse but still an illegal one. This is a saddening and sickening story.

  • This was an amazing article. I personally love an article having to do with crime specially if its talking about serial killers. I have heard about Dahmer but never really heard the story of his victims. All I knew was who we was. I loved how it shows a background of Dahmer childhood. Its crazy how this victim could have been so close to being saved. Its also so interesting to see how Dahmer got away for such a long time. Its sad that people always remember the bad guy instead of knowing of the victims. I loved the story in general I really appreciate the way the writer demonstrate with such detail to have readers picture the story while reading it. Amazing job, great article.

  • Before reading this I had no idea who this was the article was right the name did not ring any bells. It is awful what some people will do to others because of their sick and twisted minds how he drilled a hole in his head and put acid into it. Which made his victims turn into basically vegetables which is horrifying to think about.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.